Thursday, January 21, 2010
Vicky's Manifesto
A play can be pretty much anything as long as it holds a story and characters. For instance, I recently saw a flamenco show with my spanish class. There was a particular dance with a man and a woman. There was no dialogue, however, the gestures, movements, and facial expressions of the dancers conveyed a story. First, there was the meeting of the man and the woman, the intertwining of their two beings in love, lovers quarrels, and a disgruntled yet captured embrace at the end. To me, this dance was a play. It felt like a play. I think partially because it touched me emotionally and partially because of the fact that it told a story without coming up front and telling me. It conveyed its meaning more subtly. I think, in essence, that is what a play is. A subtle telling of life or of lives. However, this definition makes me want to force myself to dismember that concept. I think you could generally say the same of novels, that they're a telling of life or of lives, and yet one of my favorite books, Pedro Paramo by Juan Rulfo, is about death rather than life. I guess I don't really think I can really define a play because art can become anything you want it to be. There's a street artist who makes installments using garbage bags. If I presented someone with a garbage bag they wouldn't consider it art, but you can take it and make it art. I don't see why one couldn't do the same in a play.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Okay, so I agree you can do the same thing with a play, so long as you don't hire dancers to speak on stage. It is the only thing that always ends up badly and then you sometimes end up with " I have a MESSAGE and I want to convey the MESSAGE and I will do anything to get my MESSAGE across and I am making a STATEMENT" at that point it just becomes too in-your-face. And you have to be careful here between the difference between performance art and plays.
ReplyDeleteI really really like your last couple sentences, saying that art can really be anything. It is so Dadaist of you! I think in order to truly understand how you understood this flamenco dance to be a play, I think I would have to see it. To me, performing is an art but there is a difference between dance and theater; especially good dance and good theater. For good theater you need to have good actors and for good dance you need to have good dancers. I wouldn't want to watch myself prance around a stage on point because it would be terrible--I have no dance training. I think dance can still tell a story without being theater or a play.
ReplyDelete